Mostrar mensagens com a etiqueta Speculative Realism. Mostrar todas as mensagens
Mostrar mensagens com a etiqueta Speculative Realism. Mostrar todas as mensagens

segunda-feira, 8 de dezembro de 2014

A long time ago: 1995

ANDRE SIER - Skate.Exe (2014)
Galeria Luís Serpa Projectos

Input to a conversation on Andre Sier's Skate.Exe

by ANTONIO CERVEIRA PINTO

There is a cold war between post-conceptual authoritarian and bureaucratic conservatism of so-called contemporary art and the return of tekne and metis. Not that Plato and Hegel were right in condemning art to vanish in the ocean of knowledge and/or destiny. Art to my mind is a manifestation of concrete subjectivity that stays behind and also beyond knowledge, and that takes objects, history and cognition as constitutive parts of its inherently synthetic nature.

We live today, more than ever, in a multidimensional time-space framework where material objects and living beings co-exist with and relate to a variety of an ever-expanding galaxy of virtual worlds.

I call this a post-contemporary culture, and post-contemporary art the art forms within.


“ (...) we’ve spent a lot of time talking about ends, rather than means, we have a huge intellectual deficit there.” (1)

“I like to imagine the museum of the next century as a rich and interactive network of multimedia databases (...)” (2)

“On a spring evening in May 1995 hundreds of people huddled together in a lecture hall at the University of Warwick for a chance to witness the Australian performance artist, Stelarc, who believed that soon we could not only take out natural organs and install improved artificial ones but also add a third hand and an extra ear. The interest this audience had in the speaker went beyond freak-show voyeurism to an actual concern with the future of their human-form. Those who had gathered together were told how their body was soon to become obsolete and it was time to question whether, “a bipedal, breathing body with binocular vision and a 1400cc brain is an adequate biological form. It cannot cope with the quantity, complexity and quality of information it has accumulated; it is intimidated by the precision, speed and power of technology and it is biologically ill-equipped to cope with its new extraterrestrial environment.

This ‘extraterrestrial’ environment was ‘cyberspace,’ better known as ‘the internet.’” (3)

“Any escape from the contemporary requires an inhuman material lure, rather than an avant-gardist human hero to lead the way.” (4)

NOTES
  1. In “Speculative Design” by Benedict Singleton, in Speculative Aesthetics, Ed. Robin Mackay, Luke Pendrell, James Trafford. Urbanomic, 2014.
  2. In “Virtual Museums” by António Cerveira Pinto (1995), in Ex-Mater, Ed. MEIAC, 1997.
  3. In “About Cybernetic Cultures Research Unit”, 1995-. CCRU Website (2014).
  4. In “The Cosmic Addresss” by Tom Trevatt, in Speculative Aesthetics, Ed. Robin Mackay, Luke Pendrell, James Trafford. Urbanomic, 2014.
MORE

sexta-feira, 26 de setembro de 2014

Gonçalo Pena

GONÇALO PENA - 'Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Marx Club Band', 2014.

A Abertura. Em torno de um glaciar

por ANTÓNIO CERVEIRA PINTO

Esta série de pinturas de Gonçalo Pena é o resultado de uma viagem filosófica ao pós-humano, ou seja, aos contornos pensáveis e, no caso de uma exposição de figuras, imaginários, da dupla materialidade que antecede e procede o homem e a sua máquina de representações lógicas, picturais e de ações históricas, isto é, à 'ancestralidade' de que tanto escrevem os novos filósofos do 'realismo especulativo', mas também à posteridade do humano, intuitiva, postulável —segundo lógicas, geometrias e cálculos variados—, mas cuja antevisão é irrelevante para nós, pois nela já não viverá, nem pensará, o humano. E mesmo que outras consciências, extraterrestres, possam eventualmente existir, terão uma dificuldade extrema em perceber os restos que deixarmos impressos na poeira dos tempos.

Que melhor decisão, pois, para tamanho empreendimento, da parte de um artista, do que dirigir-se aos glaciares da Noruega com o livro L’aperto. L’uomo e l’animale (2002), de Giorgio Agamben, na mochila?

In our culture, the decisive political conflict, which governs every other conflict, is that between the animality and the humanity of man. That is to say, in its origin Western politics is also biopolitics. — in Agamben, Giorgio — The Open [¶17 Anthropogenesis]

Os cartões de Gonçalo Pena em exposição testemunham, assim, uma viagem 'naturalista', 'onírica' e 'imaginária' ao cerne das preocupações filosóficas, estéticas e políticas da nova ameaça que pende sobre todos nós: a certeza de uma próxima metamorfose do humano cuja configuração pós-traumática desconhecemos, como sempre.


Sobre Gonçalo Pena

Nasceu em Lisboa, em 1967. É licenciado em Belas Artes-Pintura pela ESBAL e mestre em Ciências da Comunicação pela UNL. Distinguiu-se como ilustrador em Jornais, Semanários e Revistas (Independente, o Público, Ler, Livros, Egoísta e outros). Entre 1996 e 2005, foi docente na Escola Superior de Artes e Design de Caldas da Rainha de onde saiu para dedicar-se exclusivamente ao seu trabalho como artista plástico.


Exposição

GONÇALO PENA
16 outubro - 13 novembro*
Inauguração: 16 outubro, 18:00-21:00
Galeria Luís Serpa projectos, Lisboa
Galeria online @ Puerta Cerrada

* — exposição realizada com a cortesia da Galeria Graça Brandão.


GONÇALO PENA - Zarathrustra Slip of the Tongue, 2014

EN

The Open. Around a glacier

by ANTONIO CERVEIRA PINTO
In our culture, the decisive political conflict, which governs every other conflict, is that between the animality and the humanity of man. That is to say, in its origin Western politics is also biopolitics. - In Agamben , Giorgio - The Open [ ¶17 anthropogenesis ]

These new paintings by Gonçalo Pena are the result of a philosophical journey into the post-human, that is, towards the thinkable and imaginary (this is a figurative art exhibition) hedges of a double materiality. The one that precedes for ages mankind and its logical and pictorial representations, as well as its historical actions, which the young philosophers of Speculative Realism call the "ancestral time". And the one time after the humans have long been extinct. A time forward about which we can have a vague intuition, or even design some hypotheses and postulate some mathematical and physics predictions, but that in the end will have neither meaning or substance to us as a species, meaning a temporary form of life. Even if extraterrestrials would find our remains dispersed in the outer space they will probably not figure out any conceptual framework of such dust and incomprehensible drawings. What better decision on the part of the artist than to address the glaciers of Norway with the book Aperto, de Giorgio Agamben, in the backpack?

Gonçalo Pena's cards on display witness a 'naturalist', as well 'imaginary' journey to the heart of some philosophical, aesthetic and political concerns related to the new threat that hangs over us all: the certainty of a next metamorphosis of the humankind, which post-traumatic setting we ignore as always.


About Gonçalo Pena

Born in Lisbon in 1967 has a degree in Fine Arts - Painting by ESBAL and Master in Communication Science from UNL. He distinguished himself as an illustrator for newspapers, Weeklies and Magazines (O Independente, Publico, Ler, Livros, Egoísta and others). Between 1996 and 2005 he was a lecturer in the School of Arts and Design of Caldas da Rainha which he left to devote himself exclusively to his work as an artist.


Quotes from The Open. Man and Animal (2004, 2002)


in ¶2 Acephalus

Indeed, one of the central issues of Kojève’s lectures on Hegel, which Bataille attended at the École des Hautes Études, was the problem of the end of history and the figure that man and nature would assume in the posthistorical world, when the patient process of work and negation, by means of which the animal of the species Homo sapiens had become human, reached completion. In one of his characteristic gestures, Kojève dedicates to this problem only a footnote to the 1938-39 course.

    The disappearance of Man at the end of History is not a cosmic catastrophe: the natural World remains what it has been from all eternity. And it is not a biological catastrophe either: Man remains alive as animal in harmony with Nature or given Being. What disap- pears is Man properly so called—that is, Action negating the given, and Error, or, in general, the Subject opposed to the Object. In point of fact, the end of human Time or History—that is, the definitive annihilation of Man properly so called or of the free and historical I ndividual—means quite simply the cessation of Action in the strong sense of the term. Practically, this means: the disappearance of wars and bloody revolutions. And the disappearance of P hilosophy ; for since Man no longer changes himself essentially, there is no longer any reason to change the (true) principles which are at the basis of his knowledge of the World and of himself. But all the rest can be preserved indefinitely; art, love, play, etc., etc.; in short, everything that makes Man happy.

...

The end of history involves, then, an “epilogue” in which human negativity is preserved as a “remnant” in the form of eroticism, laughter, joy in the face of death. In the uncertain light of this epilogue, the wise man, sovereign and self-conscious, sees not animal heads passing again before his eyes, but rather the acephalous figures of the hommes farouchement religieux , “lovers,” or “sorcerer’s apprentices.” The epilogue, however, would prove to be fragile. In 1939 , with the war by now inevitable, a declaration by the Collège de Sociologie betrays its impotence, denouncing the passivity and absence of reaction in the face of war as a form of massive “devirilization,” in which men are transformed into a sort of “conscious sheep resigned to the slaughterhouse.” 5 Though in a sense different from the one Kojève had in mind, men had now truly become animals again.


in ¶20 Outside of Being

And if one day, according to a now-classic image, the “face in the sand” that the sciences of man have formed on the shore of our history should finally be erased, what will appear in its place will not be a new mandylion or “Veronica” of a regained human- ity or animality. The righteous with animal heads in the minia- ture in the Ambrosian do not represent a new declension of the man-animal relation so much as a figure of the “great ignorance” which lets both of them be outside of being, saved precisely in their being unsavable. Perhaps there is still a way in which living beings can sit at the messianic banquet of the righteous without taking on a historical task and without setting the anthropologi- cal machine into action. Once again, the solution of the mysteri- um coniunctionis by which the human has been produced passes through an unprecedented inquiry into the practico-political mystery of separation.

The complete online book


Exhibition Venue

GONÇALO PENA
October 16 - November 13, 2014
Opening: October 16, Thursday, 6-9pm

GALERIA LUIS SERPA PROJECTOS
Rua Tenente Raul Cascais, 1B, 1250-268 Lisboa, Portugal

3 to 7 p.m., except Saturday, Sunday and Holidays

Bus

    Rato > 706, 709, 720, 727, 738, 758 e 773.
    Rua da Escola Politécnica > 758 e 773.
    Subway: Rato [estação terminal] Linha Amarela.

Parking

    Rua da Escola Politécnica, nº 231.

Calls

Tel.: [+351] 213 960 548
Tlm.: [+351] 964 028 807

sábado, 9 de agosto de 2014

Anti-Kosuth: changing gears back to reality

René Magritte, La trahison des images [Ceci n'est pas une pipe], 1929
Los Angeles County Museum of Art-LACMA
© René Magritte Estate/Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York/ADAGP, Paris

Six steps to an ecology of art

by ANTONIO CERVEIRA PINTO

 

Step one


Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations (ed. 1953).

The duck-rabbit, made famous by Wittgenstein
in Wikipedia

Aphorism 1-10

1. "When they (my elders) named some object, and accordingly moved towards something, I saw this and I grasped that that the thing was called by the sound they uttered when they meant to point it out.  Their intention was shown by their bodily movements, as it were the natural language of all peoples; the expression of the face, the play of the eyes, the movement of other parts of the body, and the tone of the voice which expresses our state of mind in seeking, having, rejecting, or avoiding something.  Thus, as I heard words repeatedly used in their proper places in various sentences, I gradually learnt to understand what objects they signified; and after I had trained my mouth to form these signs, I used them to express my own desires."

These words, it seems to me, give us a particular picture of the essence of human language.  It is this: the individual words in language name objects--sentences are combinations of such names.--In this picture of language we find the roots of the following idea: Every word has a meaning.  The meaning is correlated with the word.  It is the object for which the word stands.

Augustine does not speak of there being any difference between kinds of word.  If you describe the learning of language in this way you are, I believe, thinking primarily of nouns like 'table', 'chair', 'bread', and of people's names, and only secondarily of the names of certain actions and properties; and of the remaining kinds of word as something that will take care of itself.

Now think of the following use of language: I send someone shopping.  I give him a slip marked 'five red apples'.  He takes the slip to the shopkeeper, who opens the drawer marked 'apples', then he looks up the word 'red' in a table and finds a colour sample opposite it; then he says the series of cardinal numbers--I assume that he knows them by heart--up to the word 'five' and for each number he takes an apple of the same colour as the sample out of the drawer.--It is in this and simlar ways that one operates with words--"But how does he know where and how he is to look up the word 'red' and what he is to do with the word 'five'?" ---Well, I assume that he 'acts' as I have described.  Explanations come to an end somewhere.--But what is the meaning of the word 'five'? --No such thing was in question here, only how the word 'five' is used.

— in Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations with commentary on the right by Lois Shawver


Step two


Guy Débord, Rapport sur la construction des situations et sur les conditions de l'organisation et de l'action de la tendance situationniste internationale (Paris, 1957)
Guy Débord, La Société du spectacle (1967, 1971, 1992, 1996)
Raoul Vaneigem, Traité de savoir vivre à l'usage des jeunes générations (1967)
Guy Débord, La Société du spectacle, film by Guy Debord (1973)

Dans la culture - en employant le mot culture nous laissons constamment de côté les aspects scientifiques ou pédagogiques de la culture, même si la confusion s'y fait évidemment sentir au niveau des grandes théories scientifiques ou des conceptions générales de renseignement; nous désignons ainsi un complexe de l'esthétique,des sentiments et des mœurs: la réaction d'une époque sur la vie quotidienne -, les procédés contre-révolutionnaires confusionnistes sont, parallèlement, l'annexion partielle des valeurs nouvelles et une production délibérément anticulturelle avec les moyens de la grande industrie (roman, cinéma), suite naturelle à l'abêtissement de la jeunesse dans les écoles et les familles. L'idéologie dominante organise la banalisation des découvertes subversives, et les diffuse largement après stérilisation. Elle réussit même à se servir des individus subversifs :morts, par le truquage de leurs œuvres ; vivants, grâce à la confusion idéologique d'ensemble, en les droguant avecune des mystiques dont elle tient commerce.

Une des contradictions de la bourgeoisie, dans sa phase de liquidation, se trouve être ainsi de respecter le principede la création intellectuelle et artistique, de s'opposer d'emblée à ces créations, puis d'en faire usage. C'est qu'il lui faut maintenir dans une minorité le sens de la critique et de la recherche, mais sous condition d'orienter cette activité vers des disciplines utilitaires strictement fragmentées, et d'écarter la critique et la recherche d'ensemble. Dans le domaine de la culture, la bourgeoisie s'efforce de détourner le goût du nouveau, dangereux pour elle à notre époque, vers certaines formes dégradées de nouveauté, inoffensives et confuses.
— Guy Débord, Rapport sur la construction des situations et sur les conditions de l'organisation et de l'action de la tendance situationniste internationale (Paris, 1957) [Scribd-pdf]

Step three


Importing Wittgenstein's investigations into modern art conversation.

Richard Wollheim, On Drawing an Object (1964, 1965)
Richard Wollheim, Minimal Art, in Arts Magazine (January 1965)
Richard Wollheim, Art and Its Objects: an Introduction to Aesthetics. New York: Harper & Row, 1968
Richard Wollheim, The Art Lesson, in Studio International (1971)

Step four


Conceptual Paradise
Interview Art & Language (Michael Baldwin, Mel Ramsden)

S.R.: Maybe one very important or very interesting issue is that philosophical people like Deleuze or Derrida - when they think or work on art they always have such a strange cosmos of reception that we maybe don't understand why they take this conservative practice. [...]

Michael: It seems unintelligible given the philosophical import of what they say quite frequently. It's quite strange. [...] But I think that also, we shouldn't say this in public, but philosophers are bloody awful readers of art. [...] The only one I know who was really good was Wollheim. He could look at painting quite well. But philosophers like a Magritte, don't they? (laughs)

Joseph Kosuth, "Joseph Kosuth, One and Three Chairs (1965)"
in Wikipedia

I think Joseph Kosuth is a not very good illustrator and a bureaucrart.

Joseph Kosuth, One and three Chairs (1965?) [see derivative image above]
Joseph Kosuth, Arts as idea as idea (1966?) [image here]
Sheet of Museum of Normal Art stationery sent from Joseph Kosuth to Lucy Lippard and John Chandler, 1968 May 6 [image here]
Joseph Kosuth held is first solo exhibition at Leo Castelli Gallery (1969) [images here]

NB—I would like to see any document proving that Kosuth's One and Three compositions were made and shown on the year 1965.

Step five


Object-oriented art (OOA) correlates to object-oriented philosophy (OOP) and to knowledge-intensive based art (KIBA), and rejects both solipsism and encapsulated or tautological art forms. The degree of connectivity between an artwork and the public realm is not neutral, nor a non issue. Content matters, as well as techne (τέχνη). An artwork is a concrete subjectivity demonstration. It needs to play language games and style to come alive and noticeable, but its meaning and necessity goes further than utilitarian conversations, interest and bureaucracy.

Logic may be poorly designed, a fragile and temporary building due to its contingent nature, but not contingent as such; that is: Logic may be contingent in its nature, but not in its logic. This postulates a necessary split between art and knowledge. Art and Science are identical twins, but stroll along parallel avenues.


Step six


The Israeli perpetual war against Palestinians, namely on Gaza strip, is not outside art jurisdiction, though art judgments are of different nature than mass-media and propaganda.